Course Meets: T-Th 9:30-10:45
Instructor: Wayne V. McIntosh
Office: 3140C Tydings Hall
Phone: 405-4134 E-Mail: mcintosh@bss2.umd.edu
Office Hours: T-Th., 8:30-9:30 am
(or by appointment)
Teaching Assistant:
Jani Laskaris - juliol@wam.umd.edu
Office Hours: MW, 1-2pm, 2100 Tydings (BSOS Student Lounge)
FIRST REQUIREMENT:
Read the remaining requirements thoroughly
REMAINING REQUIREMENTS:
Required Readings
Available at the bookstores:
1) Van Alstyne, First Amendment: Cases & Materials, 2nd Ed. (Foundation Press, 1995).
2) Van Alstyne, First Amendment: 1998 Supplement.
3) Smolla, Jerry Falwell v. Larry Flynt: The First Amendment on Trial (U. of Ill. Press, 1990).
4) MacKinnon, Only Words (Harvard University Press, 1994).
Suggested Reading
Also available at the bookstores:
1) Boyle, Shamans, Software and Spleens. (1996).
2) Katsh, The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law. (1993).
Readings: You are responsible for and can expect to be tested on all of the readings, including those in the Van Alstyne case book, the Smolla, and MacKinnon books, and our in-class discussions. In order to facilitate discussion and understanding you of course, read assigned materials prior to class. Moreover, with regard to the major assigned cases, you will be expected to submit case briefs on the day the cases are to be discussed (see below). Of course, you are expected to be prepared to discuss all assigned readings and not just the briefed items. Although the Boyle and Katsh books are listed as suggested, they are both highly recommended for those of you who are really interested in issues related to the politics of free speech.
Participation: It is essential that everyone participate in class discussions. If, for some reason, you feel that you will not be able to actively take part in our discussions on a regular basis, please do not take this course. Of course, much of this subject matter is highly controversial stuff, so I'd expect that everybody would want to get her or his two cents worth in. But, as an added incentive, regular, informed, and thoughtful class participation will constitute 15% of your final grade.
I figure that there will be approximately 26 class sessions which will
lend themselves to discussion (for these purposes, I have excluded the
two exam dates and the first introductory meeting). Daily participation
will be evaluated in the following way: students who make a substantial
contribution to the day's discussion will receive a ++ for that day. Students
who make a minor contribution will receive a + for the day. And students
who do not contribute will receive a -. In the end, a strong majority of
++ days will garner the student an A in participation; a strong majority
of + will garner a C; a strong majority of - will garner an F. A mixed
record will be graded accordingly.
Each brief is to be neatly typed, and should be no longer than three pages. During the class in which the briefed cases are discussed, you may feel free to make marginal notes based on our conversation. At the end of each class, briefs will be submitted to me, marginal notes and all. I will return them in about a week. Briefs submitted on the day assigned will receive a +; late or missing briefs will receive a -. (Of course, I reserve the right to assign a - to truly sloppy or thoughtless briefs even if submitted on time). Warning: Failure to brief assigned cases will be lethal to your successful completion of this course.
Exams: There will be a mid-term and a final examination.
Each will constitute 25% of your final grade. The mid-term is scheduled
for Thursday, October 29th, during regular class hours. The final is scheduled
for Thursday, December 17th from 10:30am to 12:30pm. One week
before each exam you will be given a sample exam from which to study. These
sample exams will include a number of questions, some of which will appear
on your actual exam. Makeup or early exams will only be administered for
the most extreme emergencies.
Your subject should be chosen from among the topic headings presented
in the course outline. While I can be flexible about the precise format,
the ultimate goal of the paper will be a more thorough examination of the
topic than we are able to cover in class, including additional cases on
point (or, perhaps, more exhaustive reflection on dissents/concurrences)
and consideration of at least one law review article or one of the recommended
texts on the question. Use of WWW sources (only among the links provided)
is encouraged, but you must be sure to document carefully. Citation and
documentation protocols are thoroughly discussed and outlined on the course
webpage. These papers must by typed in 12 pt. font, double-spaced, with
standard margins. They should be free of typos, misspellings, and grammatical
errors. And they should approximate 20 pages in length. The paper will
constitute 20% of your final grade. Although it is not required, submission
of a 1st draft is strongly encouraged. Those who select to give
me a paper draft by November 25 (fully documented and at least 15 pages
in length) will be awarded a bonus (up to 10 points) that will be added
into the final grade calculation.
Extra-Credit: None!
Recap: Evaluation:
Daily participation = 15%
Daily briefs = 15%
Research paper = 20%
Mid-term exam = 25%
Final exam = 25%
Important Dates:
Sept. 14 Last day to drop/add
Oct. 1 Last day to clear paper topics
Oct. 29 Mid-term
Nov. 25 1st drafts of papers due
Nov. 26-29 Thanksgiving Recess
Dec. 3 Papers due
Dec. 17 Final Exam (Thursday, 10:30am-12:30pm)
September 1-3
TOPIC: THE FOUNDERS & THE BILL OF RIGHTS
READINGS: NONE
ASSIGNMENT: NONE
PART II: DEVELOPMENT OF FIRST AMENDMENT STANDARDS
(Reminder: All briefs marked with an * are to be turned in on the dates they are scheduled for discussion. You should brief all assigned cases for study purposes)
September 8-10
TOPIC: The Founders & the Bill of Rights
Free Speech v. Public Interest
READINGS: Van Alstyne, pp. 1-34; pp. 35-46, 58-73, 86-89 and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: Patterson v. Colorado;
*Schenck v. U.S.; Abrams v. U.S.; *Gitlow
v. NY; *Whitney v. California; Bridges v. California.
September 15-17
TOPIC: Same topic continued
READINGS: Van Alstyne, pp. 129, 142-145, and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *Sheppard v. Maxwell;
Wood v. Georgia; Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart; Seattle
Times v. Rhinehart; *Dennis v. U.S.; *Brandenburg v. Ohio.
PART III: WHERE YOU "SPEAK" MAKES A DIFFERENCE
September 22-24
TOPIC: Situating the Right to Free Speech
READINGS: Cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins; Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement; *Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee; *South Boston Allied War Veterans' Council v. Irish American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston; *Lebron v. National RR Passenger Corp.; *Turner Broadcasting System v. FCC (Supplement); *Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium v. FCC (Supplement).
NOTE: Remember, October 1 is the last day to clear your paper topic
with me!
September 29 - October 1
PART IV: WHO SPEAKS MAY MAKE A DIFFERENCE
TOPIC: Speech & The Government-Related Speaker
READINGS: Cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: Connick v. Myers;
*Elrod v. Burns.
PART V: FREE SPEECH & CAMPAIGN FINANCE
TOPIC: Regulating the Uses of Money & Speech
READINGS: Cases below and associated text.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *Buckley v. Valeo;
FEC v. NCPAC; *McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission; *Colorado
Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC (Supplement).
PART VI: FIGHTING WORDS & OFFENSIVE SPEECH
October 6-8
TOPIC: From "F--- the Draft" to Burning Crosses: How Far Can You Go?
READINGS: Cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: Hess v. Indiana;*Cohen
v. California; Rankin v. McPherson; *R.A.V. v. St. Paul;
*Wisconsin v. Mitchell.
PART VII: SYMBOLIC SPEECH
October 13-15
TOPIC: Dissent & the Use of "Sacred" Symbols
READINGS: Van Alstyne pp. 298-303, 326-329, and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: Tinker v. Des Moines School District; *U.S. v. O'Brien; Clark v. CCNV; Spence v. Washington; *Texas v. Johnson.
October 20-22
PART VIII: FREE PRESS, PRIVACY & DEFAMATION
TOPIC: The First Amendment & the Law of Libel
READINGS: Van Alstyne pp. 203-204 and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *New York Times v.
Sullivan; Time v. Hill; Gertz v. Welch, Inc.; *Campbell
v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
PART IX: SUPPRESSING FUTURE PUBLICATION & SPEECH
TOPIC: Prior Restraints
READINGS: Cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *New York Times v.
U.S.; Southeastern Promotions v. Conrad.
October 29
MIDTERM EXAM
October 29-November 5
TOPIC: The First Amendment in Practice
READINGS: Smolla, Falwell v. Flynt (whole thing)
ASSIGNMENT: In lieu of any briefs, I would like each of you to submit a short (3 page) summary of the Smolla book. Due today.
NOTE: I assigned this book for two reasons: one, to give you some real
persp ective on an actual First Amendment case, and two, to give you a
little rest and relaxation from the drudgery of case work. In other words,
this should be fun reading (it has everything--sex, politics, religion,
even drugs). Nonetheless, while having fun with it, I mean for you to take
it seriously--i.e., be prepared to discuss it and to be tested on it.
PART X: THE LESSER PROTECTION OF NONPOLITICAL SPEECH
November 10-12
TOPIC: Regulating Commercial Speech
READINGS: Van Alstyne pp. 681-684, 740-754, and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: Valentine v. Chrestensen; *Bigelow v. Virginia; Posadas v. Tourism Company; City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.; Rubin v. Coors Brewing Company; *44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island (Supplement).
TOPIC: The Obscenity/Pornography Conundrum:
The First Amendment & Community Morals
READINGS: Van Alstyne pp. 754-763 and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *Roth v. U.S.;
"Memoirs" v. Massachusetts; *Stanley v. Georgia.
November 17-24
TOPIC: Same topic continued; contemporary twists
READINGS: Van Alstyne pp. 831-834 and cases below.
ASSIGNMENT: Please brief the following cases: *Miller v. California;
*Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton (pay special attention to Brennan's
dissent in this one); New York v. Ferber; *Barnes v. Glen Theatre;
*ABA V. Hudnut., *Reno v. ACLU (Supplement).
November 26
TOPIC: Thanksgiving
READINGS: Anything you want
ASSIGNMENT: Eat till you drop
December 1-8
TOPIC: Mackinnon
READINGS: Mackinnon book in entirety.
ASSIGNMENT: Write a brief summary of the author's arguments (approx.
3 pages).
PART XII: CONCLUDING THOUGHTS ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT
NOTE 2: YOUR PAPERS ARE DUE DECEMBER 3!!!
December 10
TOPIC: Course conclusion
READINGS: None
ASSIGNMENT: None
December 17
FINAL EXAM
Thursday, 10:30AM-12:30PM