Court Cases

Along with new advertising technologies, there are legal issues that users and abusers of pop-up ads will have to encounter.  AOL and Gator.com are just a few of the companies that were noticed on separate counts. They both ran into some trouble abusing new pop-up ad technology and someone confronted these companies with lawsuits.
Hampton G. Booker and Arthur Sweeney, showed up in court in February 2001, stating that AOL had violated its “Terms of Service” by using pop-up ads.  Since AOL charges their customers on an hourly quota, they argued that pop-up ads were taking up too much of their time while using the Internet service, provided by AOL.  Eventually AOL on the other hand, argued that when a customer has a dispute among the “Terms of Service”, it requires plaintiffs to bring claims to Virginia.  Booker and Sweeney then concluded that “they would have to litigate individual cases in Virginia small claims court, and to do so would be economically impractical.” [Do not have source]
Many agree with Booker and Sweeney’s argument against the fact that pop-up ads driven by the Internet service provider takes up valuable time. The fact that AOL customers have monthly online time quotas, and pop-up ads are nothing rare, brings up lots of speculation about AOL’s goals. Clearly subscribers will spend the time fighting off constant pop-up ads, and then eventually will need to upgrade their quotas to actually get to do better things than close windows every session.
Another recent case involving pop-up ads is Gator.com v. Interactive Adverting Bureau (IAB) however this case has not yet reached litigation.  On August 28, 2001 Gator.com filed a lawsuit against the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), to protect its right to cover up pop-up ads directed by Web sites.  Gator designed a program called the “Companion Pop-up Banner”, which allows Gator.com sponsored ads to automatically paste themselves over original pop-up ads.  Some critics say that this type of technology is like putting another cover on top of a magazine.  Gator states that this type of technology is on more than 8 million computers in the United States alone.  The IAB is an internationally known company that litigates advertising and represents major content sites that rely on ad revenue to run their business.  IAB Chief Executive Robin Webster said in an interview, “the company's advertising is violating trademark and intellectual property rights of its member companies. By placing ads on other companies' Web sites without their authorization, this deceives the consumer by visually altering the Web sites; it falsely suggests some affiliation between the Gator ads and the host Web site, and it interferes with the revenues of the Web sites.”   In this situation it seems that the IAB would be doing the suing, but Gator.com primarily drew the suits to prevent the IAB from taking legal measure.  Gator’s lawyers declared that when the actual software is installed, the user knows that it will receive advertisements based on interests, and that consumers can easily modify the program so it will not cover up any pop-up ads directed by Websites.  Furthermore, Gator says the practice is a service for consumers, but legal experts say that because Gator is profiting from the sale of advertising that feeds off another Web site's advertising this could be a tough legal case for Gator.com.
 In both of these cases, the ramifications that will occur are not as straightforward as they might seem. In the AOL case many rational citizens will agree, that using up time with pop-up ads paid by the consumer, is absolutely unjust.  This does not only apply for AOL but for Microsoft, or any other Internet Service Provider that provides interruptions in their service with advertisements.  Sure, the Internet is another form of media just like the television which thrives on advertisements, but covering up a television with new ads just like Gator does might be a little too far fetched for legal analysts to agree with.  This might be good for consumers at the same time, only allowing them to see advertisements that meet their preferences. Many will agree with perspectives illustrated by both cases and pop-up ads are merely evolving to become socially acceptable, just like abrupt television ads.
 

Previous Section | Home | Next Section