County Faces A Tough Call On Head Start
Montgomery Panel Votes To Retain Service Level, Not Admit More Children

By Brigid Schulte
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, April 26, 2003; Page A01

Most mornings, 4-year-old Dorian Cardenas Rios searches his family's tiny Langley Park apartment for scraps of paper and crayons to pack in his Scooby-Doo backpack, so desperate is he to go to preschool.

Instead, from 7 a.m., when his parents, recent immigrants from Bolivia, drop him off at the babysitter, to 4 p.m., when they pick him up, he watches television. All day. Every day. "When the TV set gets too hot," he said through an interpreter, "that's when it's time to turn it off."

Montgomery County School Superintendent Jerry D. Weast says there are at least 1,000 children like Dorian in the county. Their parents cannot afford to send them to private preschool. And there's not enough room for them in Head Start, the federal program designed to prepare needy children for school and provide their families with social, physical and psychological support.

In recent months, children like Dorian have prompted a fierce, soul-searching debate among the county's leaders. In a year of budget shortfalls, they say they have two choices: leave intact the $14.6 million Head Start program and its myriad of dental, medical and social services, or cut some of those services to make room for more children.

The arguments -- about what Head Start is and whom it should serve -- echo a stormy national debate as the Bush administration seeks to make it more academic, and as a rapidly growing non-English-speaking population puts increasing strain on the 34-year-old program.

Yesterday, a County Council committee unanimously approved a recommendation wrought after months of deliberations by a specially convened work group: leave Head Start alone. If you dilute the services for the neediest of the needy, the group concluded, you destroy what has made Head Start work for decades.

"Head Start is about educating the whole child," said County Council President Michael L. Subin (D-At Large). "This is about how many whole kids are we getting to. Not just how many bodies."

Montgomery officials are in this dilemma in part because they have always done Head Start differently. And it has cost them vastly more. Instead of offering the intensive services only to those who meet the federal definition of poverty, they have long included children from families who meet the county's much higher income standards for poverty, doubling the number of children. All the county's Head Start teachers are certified public school teachers, while nationally, until recently, a Head Start teacher needed just a high school diploma.

As a result, Montgomery's program spends $8,897 a child, compared with most programs' average of about $5,000. And although the federal government pays for 80 percent of most Head Start programs, in Montgomery it picks up 31 percent.

This year, county officials say, they simply can't stretch the dollars any further. Even so, they agreed yesterday to look for $1 million more just to keep the same number of needy children -- 2,363 -- in preschool next year as this year.

"Are there kids not going to get in that should? Yes. Does that trouble me? Hell, yes," County Council member Tom Perez (D-Silver Spring) said of the work group's recommendation. "But Head Start has to be about more than learning the ABCs, especially for kids in need."

On the other side of the divide is Weast. As superintendent of Maryland's largest school system, he is struggling to respond to an influx of poor and non-English-speaking immigrant children, at a time when the federal No Child Left Behind law has required a high-stakes testing regime as early as third grade.

Weast points to studies that have found that when poor children, particularly those who speak little English, have had preschool, they come to kindergarten more on par with their middle-class peers. If the achievement gap that separates African American and Latino children from their higher-scoring white and Asian classmates is going to narrow, he believes, the work must begin even before kindergarten, when 1,000 poor children show up without having had any preschool, his own figures show.

So in October, Weast floated a plan to reduce Head Start social services and free up money that could be used to add 1,000 children to a revamped program he called "Fast Start." The idea was quickly and roundly rebuked, with leaders such as Perez calling it "False Start."

"Who decides who gets saved?" Weast said last week. "I'm willing to take the heat on the program design no one liked. But we should be designing a program for all children, when we know they're all equally suffering. To ignore great groups of children is morally wrong."

The recommendation to leave Head Start as is -- to serve about the same number of children -- has unearthed tensions among some Latino and African American leaders.

Fernando Cruz-Villalba, head of the Hispanic Alliance in Montgomery County and a member of the county's work group, said he felt his voice was drowned out by African American Head Start advocates for whom the program works like a "well-oiled machine." "A lot of the kids getting nothing are Latino," he said. "I'd rather they get something rather than nothing. Because once they surface in kindergarten so far behind, educators tell us it's too late."

Judy Docca, head of the county NAACP's education committee, countered: "We have never lobbied for African American children only. We have said Head Start children. Period."

For months, the choice was described as being between giving some children a Cadillac or more children a Hyundai. "We want everyone to have a Cadillac," Docca said.

But with money so tight, county leaders say the Cadillac simply is not possible this year. And with a new state law requiring preschool for all needy 4-year-olds by 2007, they know that soon they will have to find a way to reach those 1,000 children without sacrificing quality. They have appointed a task force to make recommendations by the end of the year.

Complicating the debate is a new federal mandate to put seat restraints and adult monitors on all buses that carry Head Start children. Montgomery County estimated that it would cost $2 million to comply -- or half the $4 million it receives from the federal government every year for the program. Fairfax County also is in a bind. School officials there figured it would cost more to meet the transportation requirement than they receive in federal money. Like Montgomery, Fairfax has applied for a waiver.

Under Montgomery's current plan, the school system is retrofitting some buses and proposing to offer Head Start next year in 23 geographically clustered schools, half this year's number. Half as many children will be in the 31/4-hour program as are now. The rest will be in the county's new 21/2-hour preschool program.

There will be 10 fewer full-time teachers and half as many instructional aides. The size of all classes will increase from 17 children to 20. But many of the hard-won social services will be the same for both groups, though there will be fewer staff members in the county preschool program.

Still, the fate of the plan remains uncertain. "Will the federal government really give the same amount of money for half the kids?" Weast has asked. County leaders, as yet, have no answer.

Weast says his ill-fated Fast Start proposal became tangled in the national debate over the future of Head Start. The Bush administration is pushing a literacy-based curriculum and wants to move Head Start from the Department of Health and Human Services to the Department of Education. Further, there is talk of dismantling federal oversight and sending Head Start money to the states in a block grant.

Longtime Head Start advocates call the moves a threat to the ideals of the program, which grew out of the nation's civil rights struggles. Head Start was designed to help the "whole child," they say, and help families break the cycle of poverty. The philosophy is that children can't learn if they are hungry or sick or under stress. Family-style lunches teach manners as well as provide nutrition. Tiny toothbrushes line classroom sinks to teach dental hygiene, and hygienists check teeth twice a year.

Yvonne Shack, a Montgomery County family services worker, said she is living proof that Head Start not only teaches children but also makes families whole. Like those of many other Head Start advocates, her story makes her intensely loyal to the program and the idea that it should not change.

She started as a Head Start parent, became a classroom volunteer, a teacher's aide and a van driver and now, as she completes her master's degree in counseling, is one of 23 family services workers in Montgomery County. In a recent week, she brought groceries to one family, referred a depressed mother to a counselor, found a dentist to fix a child's rotten front teeth, arranged for two free pairs of eyeglasses for two children, taught a parenting class on loving discipline and helped another woman set goals to find an English language class and learn to drive.

"The steps I've taken really say a lot about what Head Start is all about," she said.

Even so, many advocates say there is room for improvement. Children in the program are, by congressional mandate, required to recognize only 10 letters and a handful of numbers by the end of the year.

"Some Head Start teachers thought it wasn't even appropriate to put letters up on their walls," said Nick Zil, a researcher with Westat, one of the companies hired by the federal government to study the program's effectiveness. "But the pendulum is swinging back. There is a recognition now you can have more emphasis on emergent literacy and basic skills and still keep the whole child approach."

Still, for the coming year, with money tight and the choice of Solomon before them, county leaders decided to keep the program closed to hundreds of needy children -- and, by default, to let Dorian Cardenas Rios continue to watch television all day, every day, in order to try to save children like Nijah Webb.

On her first day in Head Start at Bel Pre Elementary in the fall, 4-year-old Nijah cursed her teachers. She hit her classmates. When she didn't get her way, she fell to the floor and kicked and cried. She didn't know how to open a book by herself, but she had a large and adult vocabulary, a byproduct of watching MTV, hanging around grown-ups and drifting from place to place with a young mother who was trailed by three misdemeanor warrants.

Within days, a psychologist came to class to work with Nijah. Her teacher and a family services worker came to Nijah's home. Nijah had been taken in by her great-grandmother, Clara Webb, a 63-year-old retired federal worker who acknowledged she "didn't know anything about anything" when it came to raising a young child these days.

They brought a car seat and children's books. They arranged for work with a speech pathologist. And when Clara Webb attended Head Start parent meetings, she found a network of support.

Now, Nijah, who once bristled at a touch, hugs freely. She has been potty-trained and no longer scribbles with abandon on the walls. She has discovered how much she loves books. She does not disrupt her small class of 17; she is part of it.

"I think in a more typical preschool environment, Nijah might have been misidentified as emotionally disturbed and put into special ed," said her teacher, Diane Tunis.

Would she have made it without so many intensive services? With fragile young lives hanging in the balance, county leaders say they are not willing to find out.

© 2003 The Washington Post Company