PGD Logo

Program On General Disarmament  

PGSD Home Page The Program on Global Security and Disarmament The People at the PGSD PGSD and PGSD-related publications
 

 

 

 

 

PGSD WORKING PAPER No. 5

DRAFT – 8 June 2003


Global Guide to Disarmament and

Non-Proliferation Education


 

Non-Governmental Organizations

(listed alphabetically by country)

A B C D E F G H I J K L M
N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z



ARMENIA

 
Armenian Centre for National and International Studies
http://www.acnis.am/
 
Contact: Raffi K. Hovannisian, director, root@acnis.am
An independent research institution with policy-oriented studies and public education as its main fields of activity. Major research focuses include the political developments around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan “and regional security issues, such as the arms trade and the internal and regional situation regarding human rights.”


BANGLADESH

 
Bangladesh Development Partnership Centre, Dhaka
http://www.geocities.com/Broadway/Balcony/1744/organization.html
 
Submitted by Sharif A. Kafi.  Submission details Centre’s aim to develop "informal disarmament and nonproliferation training modules" for NGOs and government officials, although at present they have no links to formal educational institutes.  Centre is beginning a survey on disarmament and nonproliferation education and training in Bangladesh.  Also conducts training on disarmament for media, human rights and peace activists through workshops, press conferences, rallies, etc.  Have conducted opinion polls and research on the confluence of human insecurity and small arms proliferation.

 

BELARUS  

 
International Institute for Policy Studies (IIPS), Minsk
http://iips.virtualave.net/eng/publs.html

Submitted by Vyachaslau Paznyak.  Submission details existing programs.  IIPS was established in 1995 by Belarusian academics and US scholars of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies of the Monterey Institute of International Studies.  Since then, the Institute in collaboration with CNS has organized a series of seminars on nonproliferation and export controls for government officials, journalists and NGOs in Minsk.  In addition, IIPS is organizing an “information disarmament program for parliamentarians, the military and the media.” The submission also includes a listing of publications and previous seminars.

 

BRAZIL

 
Viva Rio
www.vivario.org.br
www.desarme.org

Contact: Jessica Galeria, jessica@vivario.org.br Viva Rio is one of the biggest NGOs working on disarmament issues in South America.  It does extensive work on disarmament, including educational community awareness campaigns, congressional advocacy, outreach in the print media, TV, and radio, and collaboration with public schools.  Among many other projects and accomplishments, Viva Rio coordinated the destruction of 100,000 guns in Rio on June 24th, 2001. 

 

BURUNDI 

 
Burundi Peace Initiative of the Burundi Quakers
Information available at http://www.quaker.org/fptp/41agli.html
 
Contact: daniy@cbinf.com
The Quakers are active in many levels of peace making and conflict resolution in Burundi and the surrounding Great Lakes region.  The approximately 10,000 Quakers headquartered in Burundi have been actively reaching out to improve primary and secondary education in the region, from running (and physically rebuilding) schools to speaking about peace and conflict resolution in other communities across the region.
 
 

CAMBODIA

 
Working Group for Weapons Reduction in Cambodia
http://www.wgwr.org/
 
Contact: Neb Sinthay, Executive Coordinator, wgwr@bigpond.com.kh
A coalition of local and international organizations and individuals working to reduce the number of weapons (especially small arms) in Cambodia.  Public education is one of their main tasks.
 
 

CAMEROON

 

The Paul Ango Ela Foundation (FPAE), Yaounde

Submitted by Kalliopi Ango Ela.  Brief email references the Foundations publications which include a recent book entitled Conflicts Prevention in Central Africa:  A Perspective for a Culture of Peace.  The Foundation has also organized a photo exhibit:  “Pictures of War and End of War in Africa.”  They publish a newsletter, ENJEUX (“stakes”) addressed to decision makers and academics concerning a geopoltical analysis of issues relating to war and peace in Central Africa.

 

CANADA

 

The Markland Group
http://www.hwcn.org/link/mkg/
 
Submitted by Cornel Konig.  Brief email references the Group’s newsletter, which concerns the “problem of ensuring compliance with disarmament treaties.”
 
Project Ploughshares, Waterloo, Ontario
http://www.ploughshares.ca/
 
Submitted by Kenneth Epps.  The submission details the educational programs of the Project which are organized around four basic themes:  abolishing nuclear weapons, controlling the arms trade, reducing reliance on military forces, and building peace as a means to prevent war.  Education is provided through “the use of instruments such as workshops, consultations, and conference to engage a range of actors, from community activists to government officials, in policy discussion and development.”  Of particular relevance to the study please see “The Armed Conflict Report,” an annual publication available to students and educators at the high school and university levels, and “The Armed Conflict and Underdevelopment Learning Module” designed for informal and formal educational use.” 
 
Project Ploughshares Calgary, Alberta
http://www.cadvision.com/projectp/
 
Submitted by Sally Hodges and Bev Delong.  The submission details existing programs (whose aims are similar to their sister organization in Waterloo, Ontario) and also includes recommendations to the study, which are as follows.
  •  “We are aware that there is a need for colorful, up to date and inspiring [educational] materials for leaders, as well as for our future leaders (youth).  Materials should show what is at stake, what progress has been made and what the next steps must be.”
  •  “Harnessing the energy and vision of NGOs is one place to turn for people who are already engaged in trying to carry out a disarmament education mandate.  Having and supporting people among the latter who are very capable in the area of discussion with parliamentarians and other government representatives is essential.”
  • “In terms of the military, and media, we suggest that high level politicians and military personnel can be drawn into this work…  There is a long list of former ranking leaders who could be approached.  Of course, thanks to television, having numerous movie stars speaking out on this issue, would also help.”
  • Disarmament education should span the age groups in formal education, and be incorporated into a variety of subject matters.
  • “These courses could be placed on the Internet and accessed by every distance learning institution in the world, as well as by regular institutes of learning.”
  • However, there is a note of caution regarding “virtual learning”.  Hard copies of materials should be made available for those who do not have computer access.  Teachers may be wary of assigning Internet based lessons due to the temptation of students to log-on to inappropriate websites.  Schools should make provisions against this risk by instituting override mechanisms within public computer terminals.  Computers should be viewed as a tool, and not cultivated as the most advanced form of new learning.  For some students, distance learning is well suited, for others it may not work at all.  “Research in the theory of play (and socialization) says that children under the age of 10 should not spend a great deal of time at the computer.”
  • And regarding how UN organizations can coordinate efforts on disarmament and nonproliferation education, Hodge and Delong state that “this issue is too important for individual organizations to claim ‘territorial rights’…  Funding for local people would also bring positive results.
Also included in the submission is a description of courses offered in formal education, and the difficulties experienced by educators in establishing these programs.
 
 
PUGWASH, Conferences on Science and World Affairs
http://www.pugwash.org/about.htm
 
“The purpose of the Pugwash Conferences is to bring together, from around the world, influential scholars and public figures concerned with reducing the danger of armed conflict and seeking cooperative solutions for global problems. Meeting in private as individuals, rather than as representatives of governments or institutions, Pugwash participants exchange views and explore alternative approaches to arms control and tension reduction with a combination of candor, continuity, and flexibility seldom attained in official East-West and North-South discussions and negotiations. Yet, because of the stature of many of the Pugwash participants in their own countries (as, for example, science and arms-control advisers to governments, key figures in academies of science and universities, and former and future holders of high government office), insights from Pugwash discussions tend to penetrate quickly to the appropriate levels of official policy-making.
 
The Pugwash Conferences take their name from the location of the first meeting, which was held in 1957 in the village of Pugwash, Nova Scotia, Canada, birthplace of the American philanthropist Cyrus Eaton, who hosted the meeting. The stimulus for that gathering was a Manifesto issued in 1955 by Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein -- and signed also by Max Born, Percy Bridgman, Leopold Infeld, Frederic Joliot-Curie, Herman Muller, Linus Pauling, Cecil Powell, Joseph Rotblat, and Hideki Yukawa -- which called upon scientists of all political persuasions to assemble to discuss the threat posed to civilization by the advent of thermonuclear weapons. From that beginning evolved both a continuing series of meetings at locations all over the world -- with a growing number and diversity of participants -- and a rather decentralized organizational structure to coordinate and finance this activity. By the end of 1999, there had been over 250 Pugwash Conferences, Symposia, and Workshops, with a total attendance of over 10,000. The Conferences, which are held annually, are attended by 150 to 250 people; the more frequent topical Workshops and Symposia typically involve 30 to 50 participants. A basic rule is that participation is always by individuals in their private capacity (not as representatives of governments or organizations).”
 
 

CHINA

 
Chinese People’s Association for Peace and Disarmament (CPAPD)
 
Contact: Wu Kesheng (phone) +86 (1) 6827 1736
A nation-wide NGO with 24 affiliated member organizations founded in June 1985 by several prominent public figures from all sectors in China, this Association works for the promotion of mutual understanding, friendship and cooperation between the Chinese people and peoples of the world, in joint efforts in China as well as abroad. It “aims to safeguard world peace, strives for disarmament and prevention of a new world war…One of the major focuses of the CPAPD's work is peace education in China.”  The Association cooperates with 300 non-governmental peace organizations, research institutes and universities in 90 countries, as well as international organizations.  “In 1996 it organized, together with the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) and the Global Non-Offensive Defense Network, a multilateral seminar on security, arms control and disarmament in East Asia.”

 

 

COLOMBIA

 

Fundacion Gamma Idear, Bogata

Submitted by Amparo Mantilla de Ardila.  The submission details the aims of the organization, which include the promotion of “harmonic coexistence” between people, groups and organizations.  This harmony is obtained through peace education.  Several projects are listed, including principal initiatives in Columbia and Peru.  Ms. Mantilla de Ardila has offered assistance to compile a more complete list for the Central and South American region.  She would like to do this in Spanish.

 

COSTA RICA

 
Arias Foundation for Peace & Human Progress
http://www.arias.or.cr/
 
Contact: arias@arias.or.cr
A non-profit organization founded and run by Nobel Laureate Oscar Arias, the mission of the Foundation is “to build just and peaceful societies in Central America.” Increasingly, however, the Foundation's activities are extending beyond the region to encompass Colombia, the Caribbean and even Africa.  The Foundation consists of three centers dedicated to different topics, all of which touch on conflict prevention and resolution, whether directly or indirectly.  The one that is perhaps of greatest interest to the UN working group is the Center for Peace and Reconciliation, which runs a program dedicated to “Demilitarization and Security.”

 

EL SALVADOR

 
Centro Int. para el Estudio y la Promoción de Zonas de Paz
 
Contact: Fabio Castillo Figueroa (phone) +503 245 1579
An NGO that strives to “promote peace through the establishment of non-conflict areas.” The Center seeks to declare the Salvadoran province of Usulutan a “Peace Zone,” and believes that Peace Zones should be established in Central America and the Spanish-speaking Caribbean. Such Peace Zones could “help to secure democracy, human rights, regional integration, conflict resolution and disarmament.”

 

GERMANY

 
Berlin Information Center for Transatlantic Security
http://www.bits.de/
 
Contact: Otfried Nassauer, bits@bits.de
An institute with projects that focus on landmines, the arms trade and small arms, “European Nuclear Non-proliferation,“ and many others.  It aims to use its research to affect government policies, by informing “politicians, government officials, NGOs, the media, and the general public.” 
 
Bonn International Center for Conversion
http://www.bicc.de/
 
Contact: Michael Dedek, Head of Public Relations, bicc@bicc.de
An international think-tank working on a wide variety of arms-related issues, including, “the conversion of military sources to civilian activities.”  Its scope includes a focus on demobilization and reintegration and the destruction and control of small arms and light weapons.  “Through research and analysis, technical assistance and advice, retraining programs, publications and conferences, BICC supports government and NGO initiatives on reducing military-related activities.”
 
German Foundation for International Development, Berlin
http://www.dse.de/dse-e.htm
 
Submitted by Sigrid Göbel.  Submitted a Summary Report of an international policy dialogue entitled “Development and Disarmament.”  (Awaiting document for review, in order to summarize).

 

GHANA

 
ActionAid Ghana
http://www.africaonline.com.gh/nghonet/actionaid.html
 
Contact: Isaac Richard Osei, program coordinator aaghana@africaonline.com.gh
 ActionAid Ghana is a development and conflict prevention/resolution organization that among other things operates a pilot peace education program in junior and senior secondary schools in Northern Ghana, with the goal of providing the students with conflict resolution skills and attitudes.
 
The Centre for Conflict Resolution (CENCOR)
Info available at http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/car01/
 
Contact: Arnold Quainoo, executive director, cencor@africaonline.com.gh
The mission of this center is to promote peace in West Africa, through research, education and training.  CENCOR has taken a leading role in developing and building support for proposals focusing on the control of light weapons in the West African region.

 

GUATEMALA

The Institute of Education for Sustainable Development IEPADES

Submitted by Mayda de León Wantland.  Submission details the Institute’s aim to enhance its existing program, which is working on arms control issues in Guatemala.  IEPADES works in collaboration with IANSA and FEWER on this topic.  Specific activities in the field include:  arms control work with civil society and governmental institutions to promote disarmament, arms control, nonproliferation and education to private police in the “manipulation of arms.”  Further activities include police education in the promotion of Human Rights and a culture of peace, as well as providing information to the media and general public.  A campaign of nonviolence education has been initiated and will continue through this year.

 

IRELAND  

 
Development Education for Youth (DEFY)
http://www.defy.ie/
 
Submitted on behalf of the organization by Liam Wegimont of the North South Centre, Lisboa, Portugal.  Submission details existing programs pertaining to youth outreach, youth work and empowerment under the auspices of ‘development education.’  “Development education is education for a more just world.  It is not just about economics and the Third World, it is also about the localities in which we live.  Development education does have some recreational elements, as the issues are often introduced and explored using activities that are creative and entertaining.  The more serious side of development education is the discussion of the issues and the action to bring about change that follows.”  Implicit to the ethos of this organization is that in order to engage young people in issues of concern, there is a need to inspire first.  Finding the inspiration to engage in issues of war and peace can be nurtured and enhanced by interactive and often times playful approaches to education.  This model of participatory and experiential education challenges the power structures of an ordinary classroom where students are instructed in a passive, top-down manner.  DEFY should be able to provide useful (and successful) examples of inspirational learning.  Cultivating experiential learning is an important assumption of the study.

 

JAPAN

 
The Japan Center for Conflict Prevention (JCCP), Tokyo
http://www.jccp.gr.jp/
 
Submitted by Cameron Noble.  Submission describes items sent by post for the study’s consideration, such as, the Directory of Organizations for Conflict Prevention in Asia and the Pacific.  There is mention made of the group’s website (http://www.dwcw.org) which has contact details for of all the organizations in the Directory, plus an additional 50 who have registered on-line.  Also the Center’s annual report has been posted, detailing existing programs on preventative diplomacy. 
 
The Pacific Campaign for Disarmament and Security (PCDS)
http://www.island.net/~pcdsres/
 
Contact: CXJ15621@nifty.ne.jp
PCDS is a consistent voice for peace and disarmament in Northeast Asia.  It works to promote a variety of nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament initiatives, including the establishment of a “Northeast Asia Nuclear Weapons Free Zone,” which is the subject of one of its active research programs.
 
Peace Boat
www.peaceboat.org
 
Contact: pbglobal@peaceboat.gr.jp
Organizes educational cruises on disarmament, peace and sustainable development issues. Develops disarmament education presentations and workshops in English and Japanese.
 
Peace Resource Cooperative
http://www.euconflict.org/euconflict/guides/orgs/as_aus/262a.htm
 
Contact: Hiromichi Umebayashi, director peacedepot@y.email.ne.jp
Together these two Japanese NGOs research and publish reports on a many different security and defense topics (especially on nuclear weapons) and on the Pacific Rim regional security network.  They “aim to provide citizens with an international perspective on the security situation in East Asia and the Pacific.”
 
Peace Depot, Yokohama
http://www.peacedepot.org/e-news/whatspd/whatspd.html
 
Submitted by Hiro Umebayashi.  Independent peace research and educational institution, which provides information in the field of disarmament and nonproliferation education to a wide audience:  media, parliamentarians, activist communities, and municipal leaders.  Peace Depot publishes bi-monthly periodical “Nuclear Weapon and Nuclear Test Monitor” (with a readership of 800), and the annual publication entitled “Nuclear Disarmament and Nuclear Free Local Authorities” (distributed to 300 local municipalities). 
 
Plutonium Action Hiroshima, Hiroshima City
http://www.wise-paris.org/english/ournewsletter/2/whoiswho.html
 
Submitted by Satomi Oba.  Reference to existing programs which include public education about the dangers of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear weapons, the containment of plutonium, the proposal to reprocess plutonium and the risks involved with transporting fissile materials.  Public education is conducted through organizing lecture series, informational video screenings, dialogue with other activists and NGOs, and the publication of a regular newsletter that has focused on a variety of issues, such as, the World Court Project (see submission under UK), the NPT Review Conference proceedings, and non violent civil resistance meant to call attention to nuclear weapons on an international scale.  The Project also serves as a translation service for useful materials, and assists in the organization of Hibakusha activities as a means to educate younger generations.  There is also included a list of publications regarding nuclear weapons disarmament, as well as their effect on people and the environment.

 

JORDAN

 
The Center for Research on Arms Control & Security (CRACS)
http://www.euconflict.org/euconflict/guides/orgs/meast/438.htm
 
Contact: Ayman Khalil, director, Hostmaster@jo.rdg.ac.uk
The Center is “actively engaged in initiating a conflict resolution program specifically oriented towards the Middle East region.”  One of the immediate objectives of the program is to “establish the nucleus for a 'Regional Council for Conflict Resolution in the Middle East', to address the growing conflicts and disputes in this troubled area.”

 

KENYA

 
Africa Peace Forum
 
Contact: Raymond Kiteva, coordinator, kilenem@africaonline.co.ke
An organization engaged in research and advocacy around peace and security issues in the Horn of Africa and the Great Lakes Region.  Its specific areas of research interest include “political and constitutional reform, demilitarization, mediation, community participation in peace processes and conflict management structures. Project activities include collaborative research, workshops, and a recently launched internship program.”
 
Interchurch Peace Council
http://www.ikv.nl (Dutch)
 
Contact: Mient Jan Faber, general secretary, HCA@antenna.nl
An organization created by the Dutch Christian churches to study current issues of war and peace, attempting to “identify activities that can prevent or stop war and foster peace, reconciliation and civil integration.”  The Council also “remains vigilant and active on arms issues, particularly nuclear arms and proliferation” with the argument that “now that the Cold War is over, there seems to be less justification than ever for these weapons.”
 
International Resource Group on Disarmament of Security in the Horn of Africa (IRG)
http://www.ploughshares.ca/CONTENT/BUILD%20PEACE/IRG.html
 
Contact: Josephine Odera, programme manager, kilenem@africaonline.co.ke
NGO designed to promote peace and stability in the Horn of Africa.  Began with the mandate to disarm and reintegrate soldiers in Somalis in 1994, but soon expanded to cover broader security issues and disarmament issues in all states on the Horn.  Conducts “extensive research” on how to deal with disarmament issues from the grassroots level.

 

LIBERIA

 
Liberian Women’s Initiative
(information can be found in “Women's Advocacy for Peace and disarmament: a long history,” UN Department for Disarmament Affairs, 2000, http://www.un.org/Depts/dda/gender/note2.htm)
 
Contact: Etweda Cooper, secretary general (phone) +231 227 095
An NGO that has engaged in a sustained campaign to bring an end to the country’s civil war.  Prior to the 1997 democratic elections, it played a major role in bringing about disarmament, and engaged in voter education activities, adopting “disarmament before elections” as its “primary advocacy point.”

 

LUXEMBOURG

 
The Cercle de Coopération des Organisations Non Gouvernementales de Développement de Luxembourg (ONGD)
http://www.ongd.lu/
 
Contact: Marie-Ange Schimmer, staff member (phone) +352 298 724
The national platform of NGOs in Luxembourg.  “The 53 member organizations of the Cercle are increasingly focusing on conflict prevention.”  In early 1998 the Cercle organized an international conference on conflict prevention and arms trade, connecting Luxembourg NGOs with international experts in the field of conflict resolution and prevention.

 

MALI

 
International Institute for Peace and Security
 
Contact: Rokiatou Ndiaye Keita, SKEITA@spider.toolnet.org
A research center established in 1998 after Mali’s Touareg rebellion came to a close, in the hopes of preventing a recurrence of the violence and consolidating the gains of that peace process. Individuals involved include leaders of the rebellion, representatives of the government, and other leaders of civil society who “participated in a program of disarmament and re-integration of rebels into security forces or society.”  Goals include conflict prevention through education and arms for development programs, and research on arms proliferation.
 
Le Mouvement National des Femmes pour la Paix (MNFP)
http://www.ib.be/grip/afri/afip.html (French)
 
Contact: Marianne Maïga, lob@datatech.toolnet.org
A network of Mali women that played an important facilitating role in activities that helped to bring the Touareg rebellion to an end. “It spurred local groups to undertake arms collection activities consistent with the government’s ‘Security First’ policy that reduced the number of small arms in the hands of civilians and rebel groups, and increased confidence in the prospects for peace.”  Further information on MNFP can be found at the website of the European Platform for Conflict Prevention and Transformation, http://www.euconflict.org/euconflict/index.html.
 
 

MOZAMBIQUE

 
Transforming Arms into Ploughshares (TAE)
 
Contact: aeccm@isl.co.mz
An NGO established with the goal of collecting and destroying all available weapons in Mozambique.  In addition to the destruction of well over 200,000 weapons, TAE has engaged in a public education campaign seeking to “reduce violence and educate civil society about its results.”
 
 
THE NETHERLANDS
 
International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms
http://www.ialana.org/
 
Provides legal information and analysis to policy makers, diplomats, activists, and the media on disarmament and international law. Key projects include follow-up to the International Court of Justice 1996 opinion on nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons convention, and Global Action to Prevent War. Director of Southern Office (Aotearoa-New Zealand): Alan Webb agw@lojo.co.nz
Director of Northern Office (Germany): Phillip Boos BBH-Marburg@t-online.de
 
 

NEW ZEALAND

 
Disarmament and Security Centre
Foundation for Peace Studies Aotearoa/New Zealand
http://www.disarmsecure.org/
 
Contact: Yvonne Duncan, coordinator, peace@fps.ak.planet.co.nz; Kate Dewes, kate@chch.planet.org.nz; Alyn Ware, alynw@attglobal.net
New center (est. 1998) in the Foundation for Peace Studies Aotearoa/New Zealand which works “to promote a peaceful and nuclear-free world and to work towards a Nuclear Weapons Convention.”  The Centre, and indeed the entire foundation, is actively engaged in educational activities on all levels, in the classroom and the broader community. 
 
Parliamentary Network for Nuclear Disarmament.
www.pnnd.org
 
Provides briefing materials, reports and other information on nuclear weapons, disarmament issues, parliamentary actions and international disarmament initiatives. PNND recognizes and affirms existing parliamentary activities and initiatives, and aims to cooperate with and complement these. Coordinator: alyn@pnnd.org
 
 

NIGERIA

 
The Africa Strategic and Peace Research Group (AFSTRAG)
http://www.wangonet.org/AFSTRAG/default.htm
 
Contact: afstrag@gacom.net
An independent research and consulting organization focusing on strategic and human security problems in Africa.  Part of its mission is to “carry out peace and disarmament research as they affect the African continent.”  AFSTRAG also “organizes seminars, workshops, conferences, roundtables and similar gatherings of scholars, military experts, policymakers and implementers to further discussion on peace and security issues.”

 

NORWAY

 

Norwegian Physicians Against Nuclear Weapons, Oslo
http://www.ippnw.org/IPPNWStudentBull2.html
 
Submitted by Prof. Dr. Kirsten Osen.  Submission describes existing programs, to provide public education, as well as specialized education to those in the medical profession about the health effects of nuclear weapons manufacture, and nuclear war.  Public education is carried out through multiple means, including media outreach, the conducting of opinion polls, a regularly published and disseminated periodical (approximately 1,500 copies produced three times each year) and maintaining a website.  Of particular interest to the study and Survey is the attached course syllabus, Radiobiology and Politics.  The course was taught to students at Oslo University under the Medical Faculty with expert lecturers.  “The list of themes included ionizing radiation and cell biology, DNA damage and repair, alpha radiation, atomic bomb scenarios, treatment of acute radiation sickness, radiation therapy, psychosocial aspects of nuclear war, risk analysis, the present nuclear threat, and the Norwegian nuclear policy.”  There has been an additional course created in disarmament and nonproliferation studies to the School Laboratory for teachers at Oslo University.
 
 

PAKISTAN

 
The Foundation for Research on International Environment, National Development and Security (FRIENDS)
http://www.friends.org.pk/main.htm
 
Contact: fr786pak@isb.comsats.net.pk
FRIENDS is a non-profit NGO which "undertakes studies and research on global, regional as well as national issues for promoting peace, harmony, [and] progress for the overall betterment of humanity."  FRIENDS performs research on issues such as human rights, environmental protection, terrorism, peace and security.  The Foundation also undertakes socio-economic development activities in collaboration with other organizations, such as the UN.  One of its issue headings is entitled "Nuclear Disarmament and Conventional Arms Control, Including Light Weapons."  On the disarmament front, FRIENDS is attempting to curtail weapons and to ultimately fulfill the UN disarmament agenda.
 
 

PERU

 
Asociación Peruana de Estudio y Investigación para la Paz (APEP)
 
Contact: Marcial Rubio Correa, executive secretary, mrubio@pucp.edu
The mission of APEP (Peruvian Association for the Study and Investigation for Peace) is to study “the importance of human security in the world today.”  Fields of interest include terrorism, drug-trafficking, military budgets and direct violence, especially in the Andes region.

 

 

RUSSIA

 

Center for Policy Studies in Russia, PIR
http://www.pircenter.org/english/
 
Submitted by Dr. Vladimir Orlov.  Submission details the organization’s existing programs.  “A non-profit, independent, Moscow-based research and public education organization, PIR was founded in April 1994. The Center is currently focused on international security, arms control, and nonproliferation issues that are directly related to Russia's internal situation, and is considered to be the leading Russian non-governmental organization working in this area.
 
The PIR Center aims to
  • promote the principles of democracy and rule of law in Russia;
  • make information on security issues available to the public and experts via newsletters, journals, and study papers;
  • independently analyze the most urgent international security issues from a Russian perspective; and
  • educate Russian decision makers, legislators, young researchers, and students in the areas of international security and arms control.”

 

SENEGAL

 

Malao
 
Submitted by Dr. Christiane Agboton-Johnson.  Submission details the organization’s existing program, to provide education about the proliferation of small arms in West Africa and their effects on local communities with a view to “establish a national and international network to fight against this phenomenon.”
 
 

SLOVENIA

 
Peace Institute
http://www.mirovni-institut.si/
 
Contact: saso.gazdic@guest.arnes.si
“The Peace Institute is a nonprofit private organization that conducts research and develops educational materials on the sociology of war, security policy, interpersonal violence, conflict resolution and nonviolence, military conversion and psychological aspects of violence.”  Established with funding from the Soros Foundation.
 
 

SOUTH AFRICA

 
Gun-Free South Africa
http://www.gca.org.za/
Contact: gunfree@wn.apc.org
 
“Gun-Free South Africa (GFSA) was launched in 1994 as a national campaign calling for the hand-in of firearms. It is now a recognized organization, supported by civil society organizations and religious leaders…GFSA works at reducing handguns and assault weapons through research and information sharing, education, political advocacy, and cooperative efforts at crime reduction.”

 

SWEDEN

 
Life-Link Friendship-Schools
http://www.life-link.org/
 
Submitted by Olena Gorova and Hans Levander, “Life-Link Friendship-Schools is an independent Non Governmental Organisation which aims to promote contact and cooperation between young people around the world and their schools, through active participation in shared projects, vital for our time (e.g. Environment, Human Rights, Conflict Resolution and Constructive Collaboration).  Life-Link projects center around three main areas of attention: Care for ourselves - Care for each other - Care for the environment. Realization of these three interdependent areas will lead to increased common security.  The Life-Link philosophy is based on Natural and Social sciences and is neither politically nor religiously aligned.  Life-Link is today a well recognized non-governmental organization with international contacts in more than 60 countries worldwide.”
 
There are recommendations made to the Study which include:
“The UN Study on education for disarmament and non-proliferation could promote youth and schools international cooperation on a large scale.  Such an effort and undertaking has not been introduced ever in history!  Youth and schools in international cooperation around vital topics of our time will help a process of WMD disarmament and non-proliferation, the youth will not find interest to rely on destructive devices and nature annihilators when solving problems and conflicts across old borders.  Some resources for schools worldwide should be considered.”
  • internet access
  • introducing an international peace curriculum
  • learning a second language
  • instituting an international program, with vast youth involvement, for building a Common and Comprehensive Global Security
 
Teachers for Peace in the International Association of Educators for Peace
http://www.homeplanet.org/MadridFinalSigningDocument.doc
 
Submission details the organization’s aim to “further the implementation of previous UN declarations, conventions and recommendations for an education for peace.”  Their belief is that “there can be no lasting disarmament and nonproliferation without an education for conflict transformation and nonviolence, intercultural understanding, all human rights and responsibilities, democracy, international co-operation and solidarity.”
 
The specific recommendations made by Teachers for Peace include
·        
Curriculum Development
Develop curricula that reflect the content of international documents such as:  the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the Tiblisi[s] Declaration of Ministers and Recommendations concerning environmental education (1977).  Supports compulsory peace education.
·        
Teacher Training
It is recommended that the “study of conflicts and conflict transformation be included in teacher training programs for all teachers.”  In post-conflict situations “teachers need in service training in how to help children with post-traumatic syndromes and in how to give young people hope for the future and empowerment to influence their own situation and society around them.”  Furthermore, teachers should be trained in “how to fight racism and xenophobia and encourage intercultural understanding.”  Such material should also be made available to journalists, and promoted as part of their training, specifically as this relates to reporting from conflict zones.
·        
School Textbooks and other teaching materials
Here the question is raised “How can sustainable disarmament and peace building be possible when at the same time children learn in their textbooks to love war and hate the enemies of their countries?”  The study should influence the transformation of this standard textbook format:  that textbooks should be written from a perspective of peace.  This is particularly important in areas of conflict, where the study could initiate “a comprehensive writing of history and school books in history that can be accepted by all [parties] concerned.”  The UNESCO Textbook Institute in Brauschweig is cited as an important example of this.
·        
Education for Nuclear Disarmament
“We believe that young people have a right to know about the effects of a possible nuclear war.”  The study should investigate the literature available to teach about nuclear war, and the survey should include a comparison of perspectives from different nations.  The Swedish branch of IPPNW is cited as one example of possible contributors to such literature development.  In 1990, IPPNW published teaching materials entitled “Facts and Figures about Nuclear War,” which was distributed to all Swedish schools.  It has subsequently been translated into Russian, English, French and German.  “We would like to see something like [this] developed through the study, translated to many more languages and put on the Internet.”
·        
A Survey of Existing Curricula
With regards to a survey of educational institutes and existing curricula, Swedish Teachers for Peace is part of a nationwide organization, the Swedish Peace Team Forum.  They offer to recommend contacts and resources. 
 
“We hope this study will lead to many open discussions in all participating countries, to co-operation between NGOs, government officials, teacher training institutes, schools and universities, to public debate in the media.  In transforming our education to an education for peace it must be the responsibility of our governments to give us the framework.  But we, the teachers, want to help.  Please use us!”

 

SWITZERLAND

 
Association of World Citizens, Geneva
http://www.unhchr.ch/Huridocda/Huridoca.nsf/
 
Submitted by Rene Wadlow. Wadlow suggests reviewing the report of UNESCO-sponsored World Congress on Disarmament 9-13 June 1980 and its recommendations for disarmament education.  As regards course work and development, Wadlow has developed a course around the NPT with a focus on “Israel and the Middle East, and the India-Pakistan-China triangle.”  Also of interest regarding course development are Adam Roberts, Professor of International Relations at Oxford University (has written on the UN and arms control) and Ibrahim Fall, on the Law Faculty of Dakar University (has “good ideas on education”).
 
International Peace Bureau, Geneva
http://www.ipb.org/pe/
 
Submitted by Colin Archer.  Submission describes existing programs such as the Global Campaign for Peace Education.  This successful campaign has been highlighted in other submissions to the study (see Reardon and Hague Appeal for Peace under USA in submissions).  After considering the role of NGOs as vital to carrying out the mandate, Archer makes the following specific recommendations to the study:
  • Composition of the Expert Group on disarmament education [requires] wide range of professionals.
  • Consultation with NGOs.
  • International Survey of existing disarmament education provision.
  • Acceptance of the need for advocacy in favour of disarmament education.
  • Need for models of disarmament education as balanced debate.
  • Pilot project on electronic materials on disarmament education for secondary school courses.
  • Cooperation with COPRED Global Directory.
  • UN Inter-Agency working group.
  • Disarmament Forum special edition.
  • Build in pedagogical links to globalization, militarism and small arms.
  • Involve municipalities and religious groups.
  • Dialogue with mass media specialists.
 
The World Peace Centre, Geneva
http://www.humanvalues-is.org/ishvpag/ishvpag.htm
 
Submitted by Prof. R. Sampatkumar.  Brief submission notes existing programs, including the Centre’s involvement in the First and Second International Meeting of the UNESCO Chairs on Peace, Human Rights, Democracy and Tolerance.  There is likewise noted a close connection with UNIDIR in Geneva.  Peace and disarmament education were principal themes in the conference “Science Religion and Ethics in the Twenty-First Century,” an event organized by the Centre in 1998.  A separate response was prepared to address the mandate more specifically, and the Centre has offered to make an oral presentation to the study if so requested.
 
 

UKRAINE

 
Centre for Independent Political Research
 
Contact: Inna Pidluska (Foreign Relations Division), kam@political.kiev.ua
The purpose of this center is to “enhance the Ukrainian people's awareness of democracy and to advance the analysis of Ukrainian domestic and international policies.”  It does this by maintaining close ties with both academic and political communities in Ukraine.  It has hosted numerous conferences, workshops, seminars and round-table discussions on a broad range of issues, including NATO expansion, arms transfers, national defense and security, mass media and communications, etc.
 
Centre for Peace, Conversion and Conflict Resolution Studies
 
Contact: Aleksandr Potekhin, potekhin@public.ua.net
Carries out research projects in the fields of peace studies, disarmament and conversion.  Research findings are disseminated among international and intergovernmental organizations, but are also of interest to the general public. The Centre holds training seminars and conferences on conflict-related issues. It is also involved in “the study of anti-Semitism, conflict resolution in ethnically mixed regions, military reform, conversion in Central and Eastern Europe and other issues.”
 
 

UNITED KINGDOM

 
Programme for Promoting Nuclear Nonproliferation
http://www.ppnn.soton.ac.uk/
 
Submitted by Ben Sanders.  Submission describes existing programs and aims which include, strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime; promoting progressive abolition of nuclear weapons; creating opportunities for dialogue on methods of strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime and promoting the abolition of nuclear weapons.  Several recommendations, or “lessons from PPNN’s work” are made to the study.   
  • NGOs can support delegations before and during the NPT process by providing objective and authoritative information
  • As the NPT Treaty lacks a secretariat, NGOs have a significant role to play in filling this gap and providing support.
  • Residential meetings, or workshops in residence, for NGOs to brief diplomats ought to be considered, allowing time to consider the complexity of issues, as well as opportunities to engage in informal manner.
Responding to Conflict, Birmingham
http://www.respond.org/
 
Submitted by Alexandra MooreSubmission describes existing programs in conflict resolution, especially concerned with assisting those who work in conflict zones.  The training and residential center hosts workshops and seminars which provide “practical capacity-building programs to support people working for peace, rights and sustainable development in conflict-affected areas of the world.”  For example, an upcoming seminar entitled Strengthening Policy and Practice is described as “a residential workshop for staff of international agencies with advisory or direct management responsibility for relief, development, rights and peace-building programs.”  The methods used are experiential and participatory.  Biographies of the Centre’s faculty, course descriptions and a list of resources are also included in the submission.  There is a special relevance to disarmament education in active conflict zones.
 
Wilton Park
http://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/web/welcome.html
 
Submitted by Barbara Johnson.  Reference to the group’s capacity as conference organizer.  “Wilton Park holds conferences on Disarmament and Nonproliferation on a regular basis.”  Attached is a list of existing programs and reports concerning disarmament and nonproliferation issues [attachment missing].  Mailed separately is a program calendar on upcoming events related to disarmament and security issues.
 
World Court Project
http://wcp.gn.apc.org/
 
Submitted by George Farebrother.  The submission describes existing programs of this “international citizens' network which is working to publicize and have implemented the 8 July 1996 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice which could find no lawful circumstance for the threat or use of nuclear weapons. The World Court Project is part of Abolition 2000, A Global Network to Abolish Nuclear Weapons”.  Listed for the study are the educational initiatives currently underway through the WCP, including:  political dialogue and education for and between government representatives and civil society; public education about the World Court Advisory Opinion; as well as on-going legal counsel for activists engaged in non violent civil resistance against nuclear weapons establishments.

 

UNITED STATES

 
Educators for Social Responsibility,
Metro Area’s Nuclear Weapons Education and Action Project, New York
http://www.esrmetro.org
 
Submitted by Kathleen Sullivan (also see Select Recommendations from Invited Contributors to the Study). Educators for Social Responsibility, Metropolitan Area works in public schools and community organisations throughout New York City to help teachers, students, parents and youth activists build skills, knowledge and community.  “Through the Nuclear Weapons Education and Action Project, ESR Metro is offering an understanding of current nuclear dangers, and an inquiry based curriculum, Nuclear Controversy, for use in high school and under graduate level education (distributed to the Experts’ Panel during the Second Session, in August 2001).  We support teachers and students in increasing their knowledge of nuclear weapons, nuclear power and nuclear waste issues, as well as developing their skills in critical thinking, and deciding on socially responsible action.”
 
Federation of American Scientists, Washington, DC
http://www.fas.org/
 
Submitted by Van Blackwood.  Submission details existing programs, including attached description of internet based education materials to alert biological scientists and engineers to the potential misuse of biotechnology, and to cultivate ethical responsibility to curb the spread of WMD.  The collaborative project entitled “The Biological Sciences: Risks, Responses and Responsibilities,” is the latest educational initiative of this “oldest organization dedicated to eliminating weapons of mass destruction.”  The Federation of American Scientists was first founded in 1945, as the Federation of Atomic Scientists, and it comprised those scientists involved in the Manhattan Project who wished to address the dangers of the nuclear age.  A defining factor of this latest educational program is summed up in the statement that “biological scientists must not wait, as the atomic scientists did, to react only after the threat has materialized.”   In collaboration with other NGOs, “the project will develop educational materials and provide free access to them on the Internet for use in courses to educate biological scientists and engineers around the world… The educational materials will be promoted for use in university courses, with the goal of exposing all graduate students in biological sciences, everywhere, to these or similar materials…  An important factor in encouraging widespread use will be the collaboration in project with NGOs from many parts of the globe…  A web-based module will be developed containing fundamental information necessary for understanding the critical and ethical questions that the student’s future work may raise.”  The first test-run of the course is due to occur at the University of Michigan, and by 2004, the entire course is expected to be up and running on the Internet, a possible prototype for web-based course material.  Information for those interested in teaching the course will also be made available.