President Anwar Sadat's Address
to the Israeli Knesset
November 20, 1977
In the name of God, Mr. Speaker of
the Knesset, ladies and gentlemen, allow me first to thank
deeply the Speaker of the Knesset for affording me this
opportunity to address you....
I come to you today on solid
ground to shape a new life and to establish peace. We all love
this land, the land of God, we all, Moslems, Christians and
Jews, all worship God....
I do not blame all those who
received my decision when I announced it to the entire world
before the Egyptian People's Assembly. I do not blame all those
who received my decision with surprise and even with amazement,
some gripped even by violent surprise. Still others interpreted
it as political, to camouflage my intentions of launching a new
war.
I would go so far as to tell you
that one of my aides at the presidential office contacted me at
a late hour following my return home from the People's Assembly
and sounded worried as he asked me: "Mr. President, what would
be our reaction if Israel actually extended an invitation to
you?"
I replied calmly: "I would accept
it immediately. I have declared that I would go to the end of
the earth. I would go to Israel, for I want to put before the
people of Israel all the facts...." No one could have ever
conceived that the president of the biggest Arab state, which
bears the heaviest burden and the main responsibility pertaining
to the cause of war and peace in the Middle East, should declare
his readiness to go to the land of the adversary while we were
still in a state of war.
We all still bear the
consequences of four fierce wars waged within 30 years. All this
at the time when the families of the 1973 October war are still
mourning under the cruel pain of bereavement of father, son,
husband and brother.
As I have already declared, I
have not consulted as far as this decision is concerned with any
of my colleagues or brothers, the Arab heads of state or the
confrontation states.
Most of those who contacted me
following the declaration of this decision expressed their
objection because of the feeling of utter suspicion and absolute
lack of confidence between the Arab states and the Palestine
people on the one hand and Israel on the other that still surges
in us all.
Many months in which peace could
have been brought about have been wasted over differences and
fruitless discussions on the procedure of convening the Geneva
conference. All have shared suspicion and absolute lack of
confidence.
But to be absolutely frank with
you, I took this decision after long thought, knowing that it
constitutes a great risk, for God Almighty has made it my fate
to assume responsibility on behalf of the Egyptian people, to
share in the responsibility of the Arab nation, the main duty of
which, dictated by responsibility, is to exploit all and every
means in a bid to save my Egyptian Arab people and the pan-Arab
nation from the horrors of new suffering and destructive wars,
the dimensions of which are foreseen only by God Himself.
After long thinking, I was
convinced that the obligation of responsibility before God and
before the people make it incumbent upon me that I should go to
the far corners of the world, even to Jerusalem to address
members of the Knesset and acquaint them with all the facts
surging in me, then I would let you decide for yourselves....
Ladies and gentlemen, there are
moments in the lives of nations and peoples when it is incumbent
upon those known for their wisdom and clarity of vision to
survey the problem, with all its complexities and vain memories,
in a bold drive towards new horizons.
Those who like us are shouldering
the same responsibilities entrusted to us are the first who
should have the courage to make determining decisions that are
consonant with the magnitude of the circumstances. We must all
rise above all forms of obsolete theories of superiority, and
the most important thing is never to forget that infallibility
is the prerogative of God alone.
If I said that I wanted to avert
from all the Arab people the horrors of shocking and destructive
wars I must sincerely declare before you that I have the same
feelings and bear the same responsibility towards all and every
man on earth, and certainly towards the Israeli people.
Any life that is lost in war is a
human life be it that of an Arab or an Israeli. A wife who
becomes a widow is a human being entitled to a happy family
life, whether she be an Arab or an Israeli.
Innocent children who are
deprived of the care and compassion of their parents are ours.
They are ours, be they living on Arab or Israeli land.
They command our full
responsibility to afford them a comfortable life today and
tomorrow.
For the sake of them all, for the
sake of the lives of all our sons and brothers, for the sake of
affording our communities the opportunity to work for the
progress and happiness of man, feeling secure and with the right
to a dignified life, for the generations to come, for a smile on
the face of every child born in our land, for all that I have
taken my decision to come to you, despite all the hazards, to
deliver my address.
I have shouldered the
prerequisites of the historic responsibility and therefore I
declared on Feb. 4, 1971, that I was willing to sign a peace
agreement with Israel. This was the first declaration made by a
responsible Arab official since the outbreak of the Arab-
Israeli conflict. Motivated by all these factors dictated by the
responsibilities of leadership, on Oct. 16, 1973, before the
Egyptian People's Assembly, I called for an international
conference to establish permanent peace based on justice. I was
not heard.
I was in the position of a man
pleading for peace or asking for a cease-fire. Motivated by the
duties of history and leadership, I signed the first
disengagement agreement, followed by the second disengagement
agreement at Sinai.
Then we proceeded, trying both
open and closed doors in a bid to find a certain road leading to
a durable and just peace.
We opened our heart to the
peoples of the entire world to make them understand our
motivations and objectives and actually to convince them of the
fact that we are advocates of justice and peacemakers. Motivated
by all these factors, I also decided to come to you with an open
mind and an open heart and with a conscious determination so
that we might establish permanent peace based on justice....
Ladies and gentlemen, let us be
frank with each other. Using straightforward words and a clear
conception with no ambiguity, let us be frank with each other
today while the entire world, both East and West, follows these
unparalleled moments, which could prove to be a radical turning
point in the history of this part of the world if not in the
history of the world as a whole.
Let us be frank with each other,
let us be frank with each other as we answer this important
question.
How can we achieve permanent
peace based on justice? Well, I have come to you carrying my
clear and frank answer to this big question, so that the people
in Israel as well as the entire world may hear it....
Before I proclaim my answer, I
wish to assure you that in my clear and frank answer I am
availing myself of a number of facts that no one can deny.
- The first fact is that no
one can build his happiness at the expense of the misery of
others.
- The second fact: never have
I spoken, nor will I ever speak, with two tongues; never
have I adopted, nor will I ever adopt, two policies. I never
deal with anyone except in one tongue, one policy and with
one face.
- The third fact: direct
confrontation is the nearest and most successful method to
reach a clear objective.
- The fourth fact: the call
for permanent and just peace based on respect for United
Nations resolutions has now become the call of the entire
world. It has become the expression of the will of the
international community, whether in official capitals where
policies are made and decisions taken, or at the level of
the world public opinion, which influences policymaking and
decision-taking.
- The fifth fact, and this is
probably the clearest and most prominent, is that the Arab
nation, in its drive for permanent peace based on justice,
does not proceed from a position of weakness. On the
contrary, it has the power and stability for a sincere will
for peace.
The Arab declared intention stems from an awareness prompted
by a heritage of civilization, that to avoid an inevitable
disaster that will befall us, you and the whole world, there
is no alternative to the establishment of permanent peace
based on justice, peace that is not swayed by suspicion or
jeopardized by ill intentions.
In the light of these facts, which I
meant to place before you the way I see them, I would also wish
to warn you, in all sincerity I warn you, against some thoughts
that could cross your minds.
Frankness makes it incumbent upon
me to tell you the following:
- First, I have not come here
for a separate agreement between Egypt and Israel. This is
not part of the policy of Egypt. The problem is not that of
Egypt and Israel.
An interim peace between Egypt and Israel, or between any
Arab confrontation state and Israel, will not bring
permanent peace based on justice in the entire region.
Rather, even if peace between all the confrontation states
and Israel were achieved in the absence of a just solution
of the Palestinian problem, never will there be that durable
and just peace upon which the entire world insists.
- Second, I have not come to
you to seek a partial peace, namely to terminate the state
of belligerency at this stage and put off the entire problem
to a subsequent stage. This is not the radical solution that
would steer us to permanent peace.
Equally, I have not come to you for a third disengagement
agreement in Sinai or in Golan or the West Bank.
For this would mean that we are merely delaying the ignition
of the fuse. It would also mean that we are lacking the
courage to face peace, that we are too weak to shoulder the
burdens and responsibilities of a durable peace based upon
justice.
I have come to you so that together
we should build a durable peace based on justice to avoid the
shedding of one single drop of blood by both sides. It is for
this reason that I have proclaimed my readiness to go to the
farthest corner of the earth.
Here I would go back to the big
question.
How can we achieve a durable
peace based on justice? In my opinion, and I declare it to the
whole world, from this forum, the answer is neither difficult
nor is it impossible despite long years of feuds, blood,
faction, strife, hatreds and deep-rooted animosity....
You want to live with us, in this
part of the world.
In all sincerity I tell you we
welcome you among us with full security and safety. This in
itself is a tremendous turning point, one of the landmarks of a
decisive historical change. We used to reject you. We had our
reasons and our fears, yes.
We refused to meet with you,
anywhere, yes.
We were together in international
conferences and organizations and our representatives did not,
and still do not, exchange greetings with you. Yes. This has
happened and is still happening.
It is also true that we used to
set as a precondition for any negotiations with you a mediator
who would meet separately with each party.
Yes. Through this procedure the
talks of the first and second disengagement agreements took
place.
Our delegates met in the first
Geneva conference without exchanging a direct word, yes, this
has happened.
Yet today I tell you, and I
declare it to the whole world, that we accept to live with you
in permanent peace based on justice. We do not want to encircle
you or be encircled ourselves by destructive missiles ready for
launching, nor by the shells of grudges and hatreds.
I have announced on more than one
occasion that Israel has become a fait accompli, recognized by
the world, and that the two superpowers have undertaken the
responsibility for its security and the defense of its
existence. As we really and truly seek peace we really and truly
welcome you to live among us in peace and security.
There was a huge wall between us
that you tried to build up over a quarter of a century but it
was destroyed in 1973. It was the wall of an implacable and
escalating psychological warfare.
It was a wall of the fear of the
force that could sweep the entire Arab nation. It was a wall of
propaganda that we were a nation reduced to immobility. Some of
you have gone as far as to say that even for 50 years to come,
the Arabs will not regain their strength. It was a wall that
always threatened with a long arm that could reach and strike
anywhere. It was a wall that warned us of extermination and
annihilation if we tried to use our legitimate rights to
liberate the occupied territories.
Together we have to admit that
that wall fell and collapsed in 1973. Yet, there remains another
wall. This wall constitutes a psychological barrier between us,
a barrier of suspicion, a barrier of rejection; a barrier of
fear, or deception, a barrier of hallucination without any
action, deed or decision.
A barrier of distorted and eroded
interpretation of every event and statement. It is this
psychological barrier that I described in official statements as
constituting 70 percent of the whole problem.
Today, through my visit to you, I
ask why don't we stretch out our hands with faith and sincerity
so that together we might destroy this barrier? Why shouldn't
our and your will meet with faith and sincerity so that together
we might remove all suspicion of fear, betrayal and bad
intentions?
Why don't we stand together with
the courage of men and the boldness of heroes who dedicate
themselves to a sublime aim? Why don't we stand together with
the same courage and daring to erect a huge edifice of peace?
An edifice that builds and does
not destroy. An edifice that serves as a beacon for generations
to come with the human message for construction, development and
the dignity of man.
Ladies and gentlemen, to tell you
the truth, peace cannot be worth its name unless it is based on
justice and not on the occupation of the land of others. It
would not be right for you to demand for yourselves what you
deny to others. With all frankness and in the spirit that has
prompted me to come to you today, I tell you you have to give up
once and for all the dreams of conquest and give up the belief
that force is the best method for dealing with the Arabs.
You should clearly understand the
lesson of confrontation between you and us. Expansion does not
pay. To speak frankly, our land does not yield itself to
bargaining, it is not even open to argument....
We cannot accept any attempt to
take away or accept to seek one inch of it nor can we accept the
principle of debating or bargaining over it.
I sincerely tell you also that
before us today lies the appropriate chance for peace. If we are
really serious in our endeavor for peace, it is a chance that
may never come again. It is a chance that if lost or wasted, the
resulting slaughter would bear the curse of humanity and of
history.
What is peace for Israel? It
means that Israel lives in the region with her Arab neighbors in
security and safety. Is that logical? I say yes. It means that
Israel lives within its borders, secure against any aggression.
Is that logical? And I say yes. It means that Israel obtains all
kinds of guarantees that will ensure these two factors. To this
demand, I say yes.
Beyond that we declare that we
accept all the international guarantees you envisage and accept.
We declare that we accept all the guarantees you want from the
two superpowers or from either of them or from the Big Five or
from some of them. Once again, I declare clearly and
unequivocally that we agree to any guarantees you accept,
because in return we shall receive the same guarantees.
In short then, when we ask what
is peace for Israel, the answer would be that Israel lives
within her borders, among her Arab neighbors in safety and
security, within the framework of all the guarantees she accepts
and that are offered to her.
But, how can this be achieved?
How can we reach this conclusion that would lead us to permanent
peace based on justice? There are facts that should be faced
with courage and clarity. There are Arab territories that Israel
has occupied and still occupies by force. We insist on complete
withdrawal from these territories, including Arab Jerusalem.
I have come to Jerusalem, the
city of peace, which will always remain as a living embodiment
of coexistence among believers of the three religions. It is
inadmissible that anyone should conceive the special status of
the city of Jerusalem within the framework of annexation or
expansionism. It should be a free and open city for all
believers.
Above all, this city should not
be severed from those who have made it their abode for
centuries. Instead of reviving the precedent of the Crusades, we
should revive the spirit of Omar Ibn al-Khattab and Saladin,
namely the spirit of tolerance and respect for right.
The holy shrines of Islam and
Christianity are not only places of worship but a living
testimony of our interrupted presence here. Politically,
spiritually and intellectually, here let us make no mistake
about the importance and reverence we Christians and Moslems
attach to Jerusalem.
Let me tell you without the
slightest hesitation that I have not come to you under this roof
to make a request that your troops evacuate the occupied
territories. Complete withdrawal from the Arab territories
occupied after 1967 is a logical and undisputed fact. Nobody
should plead for that. Any talk about permanent peace based on
justice and any move to ensure our coexistence in peace and
security in this part of the world would become meaningless
while you occupy Arab territories by force of arms.
For there is no peace that could
be built on the occupation of the land of others, otherwise it
would not be a serious peace. Yet this is a foregone conclusion
that is not open to the passion of debate if intentions are
sincere or if endeavors to establish a just and durable peace
for our and for your generations to come are genuine.
As for the Palestine cause,
nobody could deny that it is the crux of the entire problem.
Nobody in the world could accept today slogans propagated here
in Israel, ignoring the existence of a Palestinian people and
questioning even their whereabouts. Because the Palestine people
and their legitimate rights are no longer denied today by
anybody; that is nobody who has the ability of judgment can deny
or ignore it. It is an acknowledged fact, perceived by the world
community, both in the East and in the West, with support and
recognition in international documents and official statements.
It is of no use to anybody to turn deaf ears to its resounding
voice, which is being heard day and night, or to overlook its
historical reality.
Even the United States of
America, your first ally, which is absolutely committed to
safeguard Israel's security and existence and which offered and
still offers Israel every moral, material and military support.
I say, even the United States has opted to face up to reality
and admit that the Palestinian people are entitled to legitimate
rights and that the Palestine problem is the cause and essence
of the conflict and that so long as it continues to be
unresolved, the conflict will continue to aggravate, reaching
new dimensions.
In all sincerity I tell you that
there can be no peace without the Palestinians. It is a grave
error of unpredictable consequences to overlook or brush aside
this cause.
I shall not indulge in past
events such as the Balfour Declaration 60 years ago. You are
well acquainted with the relevant text. If you have found the
moral and legal justification to set up a national home on a
land that did not all belong to you, it is incumbent upon you to
show understanding of the insistence of the people of Palestine
for establishment once again of a state on their land. When some
extremists ask the Palestinians to give up the sublime
objective, this in fact means asking them to renounce their
identity and every hope for the future.
I hail the Israeli voices that
called for the recognition of the Palestinian people's right to
achieve and safeguard peace.
Here I tell you, ladies and
gentlemen, that it is no use to refrain from recognizing the
Palestinian people and their right to statehood as their right
of return. We, the Arabs, have faced this experience before with
you. And with the reality of the Israeli existence, the struggle
that took us from war to war, from victims to more victims,
until you and we have today reached the edge of a horrible abyss
and a terrifying disaster unless, together, we seize this
opportunity today of a durable peace based on justice.
You have to face reality bravely,
as I have done. There can never be any solution to a problem by
evading it or turning a deaf ear to it. Peace cannot last if
attempts are made to impose fantasy concepts on which the world
has turned its back and announced its unanimous call for the
respect of rights and facts....
Direct confrontation and
straightforwardness are the shortcuts and the most successful
way to reach a clear objective. Direct confrontation concerning
the Palestinian problem and tackling it in one single language
with a view to achieving a durable and just peace lie in the
establishment of that peace. With all the guarantees you demand,
there should be no fear of a newly born state that needs the
assistance of all countries of the world.
When the bells of peace ring
there will be no hands to beat the drums of war. Even if they
existed, they would be stilled.
Conceive with me a peace
agreement in Geneva that we would herald to a world thirsting
for peace. A peace agreement based on the following points.
- Ending the occupation of the
Arab territories occupied in 1967.
- Achievement of the
fundamental rights of the Palestinian people and their right
to self-determination, including their right to establish
their own state.
- The right of all states in
the area to live in peace within their boundaries, their
secure boundaries, which will be secured and guaranteed
through procedures to be agreed upon, which will provide
appropriate security to international boundaries in addition
to appropriate international guarantees.
- Commitment of all states in
the region to administer the relations among them in
accordance with the objectives and principles of the United
Nations Charter. Particularly the principles concerning the
nonuse of force and a solution of differences among them by
peaceful means.
- Ending the state of
belligerence in the region.
Ladies and gentlemen, peace is not a
mere endorsement of written lines. Rather it is a rewriting of
history. Peace is not a game of calling for peace to defend
certain whims or hide certain admissions. Peace in its essence
is a dire struggle against all and every ambition and whim.
Perhaps the example taken and
experienced, taken from ancient and modern history, teaches that
missiles, warships and nuclear weapons cannot establish
security. Instead they destroy what peace and security build.
For the sake of our peoples and
for the sake of the civilization made by man, we have to defend
man everywhere against rule by the force of arms so that we may
endow the rule of humanity with all the power of the values and
principles that further the sublime position of mankind.
Allow me to address my call from
this rostrum to the people of Israel. I pledge myself with true
and sincere words to every man, woman and child in Israel. I
tell them, from the Egyptian people who bless this sacred
mission of peace, I convey to you the message of peace of the
Egyptian people, who do not harbor fanaticism and whose sons,
Moslems, Christians and Jews, live together in a state of
cordiality, love and tolerance.
This is Egypt, whose people have
entrusted me with their sacred message. A message of security,
safety and peace to every man, woman and child in Israel. I say,
encourage your leadership to struggle for peace. Let all
endeavors be channeled towards building a huge stronghold for
peace instead of building destructive rockets.
Introduce to the entire world the
image of the new man in this area so that he might set an
example to the man of our age, the man of peace everywhere. Ring
the bells for your sons. Tell them that those wars were the last
of wars and the end of sorrows. Tell them that we are entering
upon a new beginning, a new life, a life of love, prosperity,
freedom and peace.
You, sorrowing mother, you,
widowed wife, you, the son who lost a brother or a father, all
the victims of wars, fill the air and space with recitals of
peace, fill bosoms and hearts with the aspirations of peace.
Make a reality that blossoms and lives. Make hope a code of
conduct and endeavor....
I have chosen to set aside all
precedents and traditions known by warring countries. In spite
of the fact that occupation of Arab territories is still there,
the declaration of my readiness to proceed to Israel came as a
great surprise that stirred many feelings and confounded many
minds. Some of them even doubted its intent.
Despite all that, the decision
was inspired by all the clarity and purity of belief and with
all the true passions of my people's will and intentions, and I
have chosen this road, considered by many to be the most
difficult road.
I have chosen to come to you with
an open heart and an open mind. I have chosen to give this great
impetus to all international efforts exerted for peace. I have
chosen to present to you, in your own home, the realities,
devoid of any scheme or whim. Not to maneuver, or win a round,
but for us to win together, the most dangerous of rounds
embattled in modern history, the battle of permanent peace based
on justice.
It is not my battle alone. Nor is
it the battle of the leadership in Israel alone. It is the
battle of all and every citizen in all our territories, whose
right it is to live in peace. It is the commitment of conscience
and responsibility in the hearts of millions.
When I put forward this
initiative, many asked what is it that I conceived as possible
to achieve during this visit and what my expectations were. And
as I answer the questions, I announce before you that I have not
thought of carrying out this initiative from the precepts of
what could be achieved during this visit. And I have come here
to deliver a message. I have delivered the message and may God
be my witness....
|