The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Questions?:
Please see the FAQ
Section
The Rosenberg
Self-Esteem Scale is perhaps the most widely-used self-esteem
measure in social science research. Dr. Rosenberg was
professor of Sociology at the University of Maryland
from 1975 until his death in 1992. He received his Ph.D.
from Columbia University in 1953, and held a variety
of positions, including at Cornell University and the
National Institute of Mental Health, prior to coming
to Maryland. Dr. Rosenberg is the author or editor of
numerous books and articles, and his work on the self-concept,
particularly the dimension of self-esteem, is world-renowned.
Dr. Florence Rosenberg, Manny's wife, has given permission
to use the Self-Esteem Scale for educational and professional
research. There is no charge associated with the use
of this scale in your professional research. However,
please be sure to give credit to Dr. Rosenberg when
you use the scale by citing his work in publications,
papers and reports. We would also appreciate receiving
copies of any published works resulting from your research
at the University of Maryland address listed below.
SELF-ESTEEM: WHAT IS IT?
Self-esteem is a positive or
negative orientation toward oneself; an overall evaluation
of one's worth or value. People are motivated to have
high self-esteem, and having it indicates positive self-regard,
not egotism. Self-esteem is only one component of the
self-concept, which Rosenberg defines as "totality of
the individual's thoughts and feelings with reference
to himself as an object." Besides self-esteem, self-efficacy
or mastery, and self-identities are important parts
of the self-concept.
Because of its widespread popularity
in everyday parlance and in popular psychology, the
concept of self-esteem may be subject to distortion
and misuse. Thus, it is recommended that that those
using the scale be familiar with the scientific study
of this concept and its complexities. Rosenberg's books
are a good starting point. Note that there are other
definitions and measures of self-esteem in the social
sciences, as well as thousands of empirical studies
and theoretical analyses of this concept in the academic
literature.
Much of Rosenberg's
work examined how social structural positions like racial
or ethnic statuses and institutional contexts like schools
or families relate to self-esteem. Here, patterned social
forces provide a characteristic set of experiences which
are actively interpreted by individuals as the self-concept
is shaped. At least four key theoretical principles
-- reflected appraisals, social comparisons, self-attributions,
and psychological centrality -- underlie the process
of self-concept formation.
In addition to examining self-esteem
as an outcome of social forces, self-esteem is often
analyzed as an independent or intervening variable.
Note that self-esteem is generally a stable characteristic
of adults, so it is not easily manipulated as an outcome
in experimental designs. Blascovich and Tomaka (1993)
indicate that "experimentally manipulated success or
failure is unlikely to have any measurable impact when
assessed against a lifetime of self-evaluative experiences"
(p. 117). It is also unrealistic to think that self-esteem
can be "taught"; rather, it is developed through an
individual's life experiences.
USING THE ROSENBERG SELF-ESTEEM
SCALE
Below you will find a copy of
the scale, along with brief instructions for scoring
it. A full description of the original scale may be
found in the Appendix of Rosenberg's Society and
the Adolescent Self-Image (see below for full citation).
PLEASE NOTE: The Department of Sociology does not have
the resources to answer individual queries about the
scale and its use. However, the information below, including
the references, should address your questions.
General Information for Using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
(SES):
-
While designed as a Guttman scale, the SES is now commonly
scored as a Likert scale. The 10 items are answered
on a four point scale ranging from strongly agree
to strongly disagree.
-
The original sample
for which the scale was developed in the 1960s consisted
of 5,024 high school juniors and seniors from 10 randomly
selected schools in New York State and was scored
as a Guttman scale. The scale generally has high reliability:
test-retest correlations are typically in the range
of .82 to .88, and Cronbach's alpha for various samples
are in the range of .77 to .88 (see Blascovich and
Tomaka, 1993 and Rosenberg, 1986 for further detail).
Studies have demonstrated both a unidimensional and
a two-factor (self-confidence and self-deprecation)structure
to the scale. To obtain norms for a sample similar
to your own, you must search the academic literature
to find research using similar samples.
-
To score the items, assign a value to each of the 10 items
as follows:
• For items 1,2,4,6,7: Strongly Agree=3, Agree=2, Disagree=1,
and Strongly Disagree=0.
• For items 3,5,8,9,10 (which are reversed in valence, and
noted with the asterisks** below): Strongly Agree=0,
Agree=1, Disagree=2, and Strongly Disagree=3.
-
The scale ranges from 0-30, with 30 indicating the highest
score possible. Other scoring options are possible.
For example, you can assign values 1-4 rather than
0-3; then scores will range from 10-40. Some researchers
use 5- or 7-point Likert scales, and again, scale
ranges would vary based on the addition of "middle"
categories of agreement.
Present the items with
these instructions. Do not print the asterisks
on the sheet you provide to respondents.
BELOW IS A LIST OF STATEMENTS DEALING WITH YOUR GENERAL FEELINGS
ABOUT YOURSELF. IF YOU STRONGLY AGREE,
CIRCLE SA. IF YOU AGREE
WITH THE STATEMENT, CIRCLE A. IF YOU DISAGREE,
CIRCLE D. IF YOU STRONGLY DISAGREE,
CIRCLE SD.
|
|
1.
STRONGLY
AGREE |
2
AGREE |
3.
DISAGREE |
4.
STRONGLY
DISAGREE |
|
1. |
I feel that I'm a person of worth, at least
on an equal plane with others. |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
2. |
I feel that I have a number of good qualities. |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
3. |
All in all, I am inclined to feel that I
am a failure.** |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
4. |
I am able to do things as well as most other
people. |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
5. |
I feel I do not have much to be proud of.** |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
6. |
I take a positive attitude toward myself. |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
7. |
On the whole, I am satisfied with myself. |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
8. |
I wish I could have more respect for myself.** |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
9. |
I certainly feel useless at times.** |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
|
10. |
At times I think I am no good at all.** |
SA |
A |
D |
SD |
References with further
characteristics or discussion of the scale and its derivatives:
Blascovich, Jim and Joseph
Tomaka. 1993. "Measures of Self-Esteem." Pp. 115-160
in J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, and L.S. Wrightsman (eds.),
Measures of Personality and Social Psychological
Attitudes. Third Edition. Ann Arbor: Institute for
Social Research.
Owens, Timothy J. 1994.
"Two Dimensions of Self-Esteem: Reciprocal Effects of
Positive Self-Worth and Self-Deprecation on Adolescent
Problems." American Sociological Review. 59:391-407.
Owens, Timothy J. 1993.
"Accentuate the Positive - and the Negative: Rethinking
the Use of Self-Esteem, Self-Deprecation, and Self-Confidence."
Social Psychology Quarterly. 56:288-99.
Owens, Timothy J. 2001.
Extending Self-Esteem Theory and Research. Cambridge:
University Press.
Rosenberg, Morris. 1965.
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton,
New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Chapter 2 discusses
construct validity.)
Rosenberg, Morris. 1986.
Conceiving the Self. Krieger: Malabar, FL.
Silber, E. and Tippett,
Jean 1965. "Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement
validation." Psychological Reports, 16, 1017-1071.
(Discusses multitrait-multimethod investigation using
RSE).
Wells, L. Edward and Gerald
Marwell. 1976. Self-Esteem: Its Conceptualization
and Measurement. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Wylie, Ruth C. 1974. The
Self-Concept (especially pp. 180-189.) Revised Edition.
Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press
FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
Related Links:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
May I have permission
to use the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in my research?
Dr. Florence Rosenberg,
Manny's wife, has given permission to use the Self-Esteem
Scale for educational and professional research. There
is no charge associated with the use of this scale in
your professional research. However, please be sure
to give credit to Dr. Rosenberg when you use the scale
by citing his work in publications, papers and reports.
We would also appreciate receiving copies of any published
works resulting from your research at the University
of Maryland address listed below.
How do I cite the scale?
You should cite the scale
according to the standards of your discipline. The most
appropriate citation is:
Rosenberg, Morris. 1989.
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image.
Revised edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University
Press.
Are there foreign language
versions of the scale available?
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem
Scale is perhaps the most widely-used self-esteem measure
in social science research. The scale has been translated
into many languages; unfortunately, the University of
Maryland is not a repository for such scales. Please
refer to the scholarly literature in the language which
you are using.
Can you tell me what
the scale cut-offs are for high and low self-esteem?
There
are no discrete cut-off points to delineate high and
low self-esteem.
It is
recommended that you consult the literature relevant
to the population you are interested in studying. By
examining this literature you should be able learn more
about the norms of a specific population.
The Rosenberg
SES may be used without explicit permission.
The author's family, however, would like to be kept
informed of its use.
Send information about how you have used the scale,
or send published research resulting from its use, to
the address below:
The Morris
Rosenberg Foundation
c/o Dept. Of Sociology
University of Maryland
2112 Art/Soc Building
College Park, MD 20742-1315
|